Mike Edholm

Toolkit

Each essay works through a case and leaves behind a test. This page collects the tests, for a reader who wants the diagnostic rather than the argument.

The Dynamic Markets Model

Five stages describing how a market’s structure changes as a technology diffuses. Answers what kind of market something is going to be, rather than how large it will get. Checked stage by stage against the fixed internet, cloud infrastructure, and the smartphone industry.

Introduced in The Dynamic Markets Model — What Kind of Market Each Stage of a Technology Becomes

Slide deck (9 slides, PPTX)

The Trilemma Test

A step scenario planning usually skips: checking whether a system’s own stated objectives are compatible before building scenarios around them. Bounds the space by constraint, establishing what a plan cannot have rather than what it might get.

Introduced in The Trilemma Test — A Pre-Scenario Diagnostic for Structural Constraints

Slide deck (10 slides, PPTX)

The Depth Test

Four questions, run in order, on any sovereignty claim: which layer it reaches, how deep that layer is, whether both jurisdiction and institutional freedom are held, and whether the position is a weapon or a guarantee of a seat. Most claims fail, and telling apart the failures that matter is most of the value.

Introduced in The Depth Test — Why Most Sovereignty Claims Fail Structurally

Slide deck (10 slides, PPTX)

The Opaque Surprise Test

Separates the third kind of surprise from the other two. Asks whether what is missing from a picture is genuinely unknowable, or merely unexamined, since only one of those answers leaves anything to do.

Introduced in Opaque Surprises — Where Scenario Planning Falls Short

Slide deck (9 slides, PPTX)

The Acquisition Test

Four questions run before a deal reaches a term sheet, on public data. Where does the target’s layer — not the target — sit on its own diffusion curve; does the valuation assume the layer’s future or its past; what does the seller know about that layer; and, for early buyers, is the infrastructure beneath it actually in place.

Introduced in Buying the Past — The Acquisition Risk Nobody’s Diligence Examines

Slide deck (21 slides, PPTX)

The Boundary Test

Four probes run before a scenario model exists, one for each place a future disappears: the unit of account, the voiding future, the constraint structure, and the clocks. The last finds phase risk — a plan that works at every level it examines and fails on the relative timing between them.

Introduced in Bounded From Below — Four places a future disappears, and what to do first

The Lead-Time Test

Four questions for any contest that looks zero-sum: what the slowest physical constraint is and how long it runs, how long the decision horizon of the people allocating is, whether the commitment can be unwound, and whether the participants can observe each other. Dates the interval in which the fight is rational, and the point at which it stops being so.

Introduced in The Two Clocks — Why Zero-Sum Behavior Is Usually Correct

Slide deck (10 slides, PPTX)

The Portability Test

Four indicators, dated at or near an industry’s peak firm count, that classify its capital as portable or anchored: a published secondary-market price for the principal asset, lending against it that survived the downturn, buyers of exiting firms’ assets from outside the industry, and plant documented as turned to another product. Crossed with the strength of increasing returns, it predicts how long a shakeout runs and what it leaves behind. Reduced to one question: who buys this if we are wrong, and at what fraction of cost?

Introduced in AI’s Four Shakeouts — Each layer sorts on the schedule its own capital allows

Slide deck (10 slides, PPTX)

Further tests join this page as their essays are published.